Lawyers not liable under consumer Act: Supreme Court of India

Supreme Court of India

Supreme Court of India, at New Delhi

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Monday stayed a ruling of the apex consumer forum holding that services rendered by an advocate to his client in the course of litigation be covered under the provisions of Consumer Protection Act.

A Bench comprising Justices L S Panta and B Sudershan Reddy stayed the ruling of National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC), which was challenged by a large number of advocate bodies after lawyers raised a hue and cry over the prospect of being sued by clients for deficient service.

The appeals were filed by Bar of Indian Lawyers, Delhi High Court Bar Association and Bar Council of India. One of the lawyers’ bodies represented by advocate Jasbir Malik argued that lawyers rendered legal assistance and not service to the clients. One Devender Kumar Gandhi had filed a complaint before District Consumer Redressal Forum alleging deficiency of service against his lawyer M Mathai. The district forum on June 1, 2000, held the lawyer liable and asked him to pay Rs 3,000 as compensation for mental agony and another Rs 1,000 as cost.

On the appeal filed by the lawyer, the state commission reversed the finding and said that lawyers were not liable to be proceeded against as the services rendered by them did not come within the ambit of the consumer law.
However, the NCDRC set aside the state commission’s verdict and held that if there was deficiency in service rendered by lawyers, complaint under Consumer Protection Act was maintainable against them.

Lawyers are not liable under Consumer Protection Act

Collected & Circulated in the interest of society for enhancing legal awareness-Adv.Sanjay J. Gaikwad.

IN CASE OF ANY QUERY OR ASSISTANCE REQUIRED, KINDLY LEAVE A REPLY BELOW

 

 

About the author

Advocateji.Com publishes problems of public & provides free advice in 24 hours on its web-site at New Delhi

4 Comments

  • Kersi says:

    cases admitted in the consumer courts in Mumbai are maintainable as per the consumer act. Please comment.

    View Comment
  • Thankaraj says:

    If an advocate prepares a sale deed negligently and consequently the transferor had to correct it by another deed.Does he come within the above protection.

    View Comment
  • K. Lakshminarayana, Advocate says:

    When was this stay order given (date) by the Apex Court taking advocates out of the purview of COPRA Act, in which case and where do i get the full text of the order

    View Comment
  • pennerusridurga says:

    after disposal of the suit on merits with contest passing one and half year time the client filed consumer case against his previous counsel is maintainable or not?

    View Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.